1. INTRODUCTION:

Biomaterials have emerged as the foundation of regenerative medicine, revolutionizing the course of therapy for injured or diseased tissue.¹ Through mechanical reinforcement, cell adhesion guidance, and biochemical signals, they bridge the distance from damage to functional restitution.² Their incorporation into therapeutic strategies has provided the means to create tissue-engineered constructs that not just restore lost tissue but also trigger native repair mechanisms. The interaction between material development and biological process has come to be seen as a motive force for the accelerated development of regenerative technologies.³ Aging populations are driving forward the need for sophisticated biomaterials, the increase in chronic illness, and the limitations of traditional surgical and pharmacological treatments. Engineered materials can create highly controlled, localized, and tissue-specific microenvironments that accelerate healing.⁴ From bone reconstruction and cartilage repair to restoration of neural networks, biomaterials have shown versatility in a wide range of medical applications. Biomaterials now comprise not only a structural component, but a therapeutic strategic tool for exact, functional regeneration.⁵ Initial generations of biomaterials emphasized bioinertness, suppressing immune responses and preventing degradation. Such inert scaffolds were passive frameworks that depended only on the body's natural healing ability. As much as they supplied structural integrity, they gave minimal biochemical cues, frequently leading to incomplete integration and poor functional recovery in complex tissue.⁶ The emerging paradigm welcomes bioactive, intelligent biomaterials that actively guide regeneration. They can deliver growth factors, communicate with the immune system, and offer molecular signals that guide cell migration, proliferation, and differentiation. They react dynamically to the cellular microenvironment, acting as active players instead of passive placeholders. This shift comes as a result of a better understanding of cell–material interactions and the fact that authentic tissue restoration can only be achieved through coupled mechanical, chemical, and biological signaling.⁷ Hydrogels have become one of the most promising classes of biomaterials for tissue repair due to their high water content and structural resemblance to the extracellular matrix (ECM).⁸ Hydrogel's hydrated 3D network is conducive to cell viability, migration, and differentiation, whereas their mechanical characteristics can be finely adjusted to be comparable to the mechanical properties of soft or load-bearing tissues.⁹ Developed from both synthetic and natural polymers, hydrogels marry the intrinsic bioactivity of biopolymers with the design freedom of synthetic chemistry. Importantly, hydrogels provide unparalleled chemical tunability. Functional groups can be introduced to support cell adhesion, triggered degradation, and site-specific delivery of drugs or growth factors.¹⁰ They can be formulated to be responsive to pH, temperature, or enzymes, delivering therapeutic moieties exactly when and where they are required. This capacity to incorporate structural mimicry, biochemical signaling, and stimuli-responsiveness renders hydrogels the perfect vehicle for applications spanning from wound healing and cartilage regeneration to organoid culture and minimally invasive therapies.¹¹ This review critically reviews hydrogel-based biomaterials as scaffolds for tissue regeneration and repair. We first present the design rules, polymer feedstocks, and fabrication techniques that control hydrogel performance. We then critically assess their performance in a range of tissue engineering applications with a focus on how they can be optimized to improve cell-material interactions, direct tissue growth, and facilitate integration with host tissue. New technologies, including injectable, self-healing, and stimulus-responsive hydrogels, are identified as having the potential to overcome ongoing clinical challenges. We critically examine the translational hurdles of biocompatibility, sterilization, scalability, and regulatory acceptability and outline what is required to translate hydrogel-based therapies from the laboratory to the clinic.¹² We also discuss emerging opportunities in 4D printing, hybrid biomaterial systems, and stem cell and gene therapy integration.¹³ Through the fusion of material science, biological function, and clinical insights, this review seeks to serve both as a foundational reference and forward-looking roadmap for driving hydrogel innovation in regenerative medicine.

2. Fundamentals of Bioactive Hydrogels:

Bioactivity of hydrogels means their ability to actively engage with biological systems and modulate cellular and molecular processes beyond structural support alone. For tissue engineering, bioactive hydrogels are constructed to offer biochemical signals like adhesive ligands, growth factors, and signaling peptides that control cell adhesion, migration, growth, and differentiation. These signals simulate the indigenous extracellular matrix (ECM), allowing for fine control of cell fate determination and tissue morphogenesis.¹⁴ One primary aspect of bioactivity is the hydrogel's capability to modulate host immune reactions and induce vascularization, two essential determinants for tissue functional integration. Immunomodulatory hydrogels can decrease pro-inflammatory effects while enhancing a pro-healing environment via macrophage polarization toward the M2 phenotype¹⁵. Similarly, hydrogels designed with angiogenic cues or degradable channels to unseal vascular infiltration sites can enhance neovascularization, enhancing nutrient and oxygen delivery in regenerating tissues.¹⁶ Natural polymers like collagen, gelatin, hyaluronic acid, alginate, and chitosan provide intrinsic bioactivity as a result of their biological source and structural likeness to the native ECM. The materials frequently include cell-recognition sites, which render them strongly supportive of cell adhesion and signaling.¹⁷ Their mechanical properties and rates of degradation are less consistent, and batch-to-batch variation restricts reproducibility in clinical uses. Synthetic polymers such as polyethylene glycol (PEG), poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA), and poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (pHEMA) offer greater control over mechanical properties, degradation, and chemical function.¹⁸ Although naturally bioinert, they may be functionalized with peptides, growth factors, or other bioactive groups to introduce biological function. Hybrid hydrogels, which consist of a natural and synthetic component, take advantage of the bioactivity of natural polymers combined with the tunability and stability of synthetic systems to offer solutions for various regenerative medicine applications.¹⁹ Hydrogel networks are created through physical crosslinking, motivated by non-covalent forces like hydrogen bonding, hydrophobic forces, ionic pairing, or crystallite formation, or chemical crosslinking, which creates covalent crosslinks between polymer chains.²⁰ Physical crosslinking has the benefit of being processed under mild conditions, maintaining cell viability and sensitive biomolecules throughout fabrication. These hydrogels tend to be reversible, enabling injectable or self-healing formulations.²¹ Contrastingly, chemically cross-linked hydrogels offer enhanced mechanical stability and long-term durability, rendering them ideal for load-bearing functions. Crosslinking chemistries are photopolymerization, click reactions, enzymatic crosslinking, and carbodiimide-mediated coupling.²² Nevertheless, chemical crosslinking can necessitate initiators, catalysts, or UV exposure that have to be cautiously managed to prevent cytotoxicity. Dual-crosslinking approaches are common in most advanced systems, combining physical and chemical mechanisms to provide an optimal balance between mechanical strength, degradability, and bioactivity. Biocompatibility underlies the translation of bioactive hydrogels to the clinic, including both primary cytocompatibility and integration with host tissue. This means not only the non-toxicity of bulk material, but also degradation by-products, which can modulate the local immune response and ultimate healing outcomes. Surface chemistry, composition, and the presence or absence of bioactive ligands all significantly modulate cellular interactions and inflammatory profiles.²³ Degradability is also vital since hydrogel needs to resorb gradually to accommodate new tissue growth while still providing structural support during the initial healing phases. Degradation can be achieved through hydrolysis, enzymatic scission, or environmental stimuli such as pH or temperature fluctuations. The degradation rates should be customized to be synchronized with tissue-specific regeneration timelines to prevent either premature scaffold collapse or extended persistence that may interfere with remodeling.²⁴ Ideally, degradation products must be bioresorbable, metabolizable, and non-immunogenic to facilitate seamless changeover from the synthetic scaffold to functional tissue.

3. Design Strategies for Intelligent Tissue Architect Hydrogels:

3.1 ECM-Mimetic Architecture and Hierarchical Structuring:

The extracellular matrix (ECM) is an extremely organized, multifunctional network that not only gives mechanical support to cells but also controls the signaling pathways crucial for tissue homeostasis and repair. It consists of fibrous proteins (collagen, elastin), glycoproteins (laminin, fibronectin), and proteoglycans organized in tissue-specific architecture. To effectively drive regeneration, engineered hydrogels need to replicate the spatial and mechanical richness of native ECM.²⁵ This involves creating ECM-mimetic architectures that can interact with integrin receptors, support mechanotransduction, and direct morphogenetic processes. A successful ECM mimic needs to incorporate nanoscale fibrillar architecture, microscale porosity, and macroscale geometry to offer a hierarchical scaffold that mirrors native tissue structure. Nanoscale fibers mimic collagen bundles and offer sites for cell anchorage; microscale pores facilitate diffusion of nutrients and invasion by cells, whereas macroscale geometry determines tissue architecture.²⁶ Such multiscale structuring is essential for mimicking natural mechanical gradients, which play a critical role in tissues such as cartilage, bone, and tendon, where various zones carry out specific functions. State-of-the-art manufacturing techniques provide fine control of hydrogel architecture.²⁷ (Figure 1) Electrospinning yields ECM-mimicking nanofibers with adjustable orientation, and freeze-drying forms a network of interconnected pores. Microfabrication and 3D/4D bioprinting provide local patterning of multiple materials and cell types within one construct. More sophisticated methods, including bio-templating from decellularized ECM, couple native biochemical complexity with hydrogel-based mechanical tunability, optimizing biomimicry and functional performance.²⁸ In addition to static mimicry, ECM-mimetic hydrogels are increasingly crafted to dynamically remodel as a function of cellular behavior. The use of degradable crosslinks responsive to cell-released enzymes (e.g., matrix metalloproteinases) allows stepwise remodeling of the scaffold so that cells may migrate, proliferate, and produce their own ECM.²⁹ Mechanical adaptability in the form of stress-stiffening or strain-softening responses further increases physiological relevance, wherein the scaffold co-evolves with regenerating tissue.³⁰

Figure No. 01. Design Framework for ECM-Mimetic and Hierarchically Structured Hydrogels

3.2 Incorporation of Biochemical Cues:

Although physical architecture gives structural directions, biochemical signals are critical in guiding particular cell behaviors, including lineage commitment, migration, and matrix deposition. The controlled delivery of bioactive molecules in hydrogels guarantees that cells are presented with signals spatially and temporally guided, which is highly reminiscent of the in vivo regenerative microenvironment.³¹ Growth factors such as VEGF, BMPs, and TGF-β are primarily responsible for vascularization, osteogenesis, and chondrogenesis, respectively. These molecules can be introduced into hydrogels through covalent tethering for local sustained availability, nanoparticle encapsulation for controlled release, or electrostatic binding to charged hydrogel domains.³² These methods preserve delicate growth factors from degradation, extend bioactivity, and reduce off-target effects. Short peptide sequences like RGD, IKVAV, and YIGSR may be grafted to hydrogel backbones to facilitate certain cell-material interactions.³³ These peptides replicate ECM protein binding domains to increase integrin-mediated adhesion and direct differentiation. Polysaccharides like hyaluronic acid, heparin, and chitosan enhance not only hydrogel biocompatibility but also the sequestration of growth factors, forming bioactive reservoirs that release signaling molecules upon stimulation by environmental cues.³⁴ New hydrogel platforms integrate multiple biochemical cues, releasing them in a gradient or sequential manner to simulate natural healing cascades.³⁵ Stimuli-responsive chemistries allow on-demand release following pH changes, enzymatic action, or light exposure. This precise control over biochemical presentation allows cells to experience a regenerative environment that is matched to the precise phase of healing.

3.3 Mechanical and Viscoelastic Tuning for Tissue-Specific Needs:

The viscoelastic and mechanical properties of hydrogels have a strong impact on cellular behavior via mechanotransduction mechanisms.³⁶ Soft matrices support neurogenesis, and stiffer scaffolds are more supportive of osteogenic differentiation. Viscoelasticity, an indicator of time-dependent deformation in response to stress, also controls processes like stem cell lineage commitment and deposition of the matrix. Intelligent hydrogels can be designed by adjusting polymer concentration, crosslink density, or the addition of reinforcing nanomaterials to access tissue-specific mechanical signatures.³⁷ Dynamic mechanical tuning enables hydrogels to respond to new tissue environments that occur during healing. As an example, degradable crosslinks may relax the matrix with time, allowing for cell-mediated remodeling.³⁸ This responsiveness allows the scaffold to provide early mechanical support while enhancing later tissue integration and maturation.

3.4 Smart and Responsive Elements:

Intelligent hydrogels contain stimulus-sensing components that modify properties or release payloads upon encountering certain stimuli. pH-responsive networks release drugs in acidic inflammatory conditions, temperature-sensitive systems like PNIPAM-based gels experience sol–gel transitions for minimally invasive delivery.³⁹ Enzyme-sensitive hydrogels selectively degrade upon exposure to tissue-specific proteases, allowing targeted release in diseased or injured tissues.⁴⁰ Photo-responsive hydrogels provide spatiotemporal control of crosslinking, degradation, or release of bioactive molecules via light activation.⁴¹ Such control provides on-demand modification of the hydrogel's structure or function and renders them extremely appealing for localized therapies and dynamic tissue engineering approaches. Incorporation of such responsive aspects converts hydrogels into active players in the healing process, with the ability to adapt in real-time.

3.5 Self-Healing and Remodeling Capabilities:

Self-healing hydrogels are engineered to heal structural damage autonomously, with mechanical integrity being retained under dynamic tissue conditions. This is by way of reversible covalent bonds (e.g., Schiff base, Diels–Alder) or supramolecular interactions (e.g., host–guest chemistry, hydrogen bonding) that re-form following disruption.⁴² These characteristics prolong implant life and minimize surgical revision.

Remodelable hydrogels take it a step further by incorporating cell-mediated degradation and matrix deposition into their architecture. Through the inclusion of degradable motifs and matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-sensitive linkers, these systems enable host cells to actively remodel the scaffold.⁴³ Such dynamic reciprocity between material and cells promotes more physiological tissue formation and unobstructed integration with the surrounding native matrix.

4. Mechanisms of Healing by Design:

4.1 Cell Recruitment and Stem Cell Niche Formation:

One of the main ways in which smart hydrogels enhance tissue regeneration is by attracting endogenous cells to the injury site. This is performed by seeding chemotactic signalling, stromal cell–derived factor-1 (SDF-1) or platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)into the hydrogel so that progenitor and immune cells are attracted.⁴⁴ By governing the spatial and temporal delivery of these cues, hydrogels can preferentially recruit target cell types while preventing unwanted invasion by inflammatory cells. In addition to straightforward recruitment, sophisticated hydrogels are engineered to mimic elements of the stem cell niche, a microenvironment that delivers biochemical, mechanical, and structural instructions necessary for stemness maintenance or differentiation direction. Through the incorporation of ECM-mimetic ligands, adjustable stiffness, and degradability control, such systems can support localized niches to maintain stem cell viability, encourage proliferation, and steer lineage commitment in a fashion commensurate with the regenerative needs of the target tissue.⁴⁵

4.2 Immune Response Modulation for Regeneration:

The outcome of whether an implanted biomaterial induces chronic inflammation or functional regeneration depends crucially on the immune system. Intelligent hydrogels can be designed to modulate immune responses, eliciting a pro-healing environment instead of a fibrotic one.⁴⁶ Surface functionalization with anti-inflammatory molecules, addition of immunomodulatory cytokines, or presentation of polysaccharides like hyaluronic acid that naturally suppress inflammation are some approaches.⁴⁷ One such target is macrophage polarization, guiding these immune cells into the M2 phenotype, promoting tissue repair by secreting anti-inflammatory cytokines and growth factors. Through incorporating immune-responsive motifs and release profiles, hydrogels can coordinate the transition from inflammation to tissue remodeling, coordinating immune function with regenerative timelines⁴⁸

4.3 Controlled Release of Bioactive Agents:

Hydrogels represent a generalizable platform for the localized and controlled delivery of therapeutic agents, avoiding systemic exposure while maximizing activity at the site of injury.⁴⁹ Bioactive agents from growth factors and peptides to nucleic acids and small-molecule drugs can be loaded by physical entrapment, covalent tethering, or affinity binding. Release kinetics are controlled by polymer composition, crosslink density, degradation rate, and molecular interactions between drug and matrix. (Figure 2) This ability to control release is essential to reproduce the staged nature of natural healing, wherein separate signaling events sequentially take place. For instance, the early release of pro-angiogenic factors creates the vascular bed, while osteogenic or neurogenic factors induce tissue-specific regeneration later.⁵⁰ Later designs utilize multi-phase or stimuli-responsive release systems to change dosing dynamically in response to environmental stimuli, e.g., enzymatic activity or changes in pH.

Figurer no. 02 Controlled Release Pathways of Bioactive Agents in Hydrogel Systems

4.4 Angiogenesis and Neurogenesis Stimulation:

Vascularization is essential for maintaining cell survival and supporting nutrient and oxygen supply within newly formed tissue. Hydrogels can be designed to promote angiogenesis by incorporating pro-angiogenic growth factors like vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) or angiopoietin-1, or by using ECM components such as fibrin that naturally encourage endothelial cell invasion ⁵¹Spatial patterning of these cues can also guide the development of vascular networks, making perfusion more efficient. Similarly, for tissues requiring functional neural integration (e.g., muscle, skin, and central nervous system constructs), hydrogels can be engineered to trigger neurogenesis.⁵² This can be accomplished through the delivery of neurotrophic factors (e.g., nerve growth factor, brain-derived neurotrophic factor), aligning anisotropic fiber networks to steer axonal growth, or by incorporating electrically conductive elements to facilitate synaptic activity. By promoting both angiogenesis and neurogenesis, hydrogels can establish a fully integrated, metabolically supported, and functionally connected tissue system⁵³

5. Applications in Tissue Repair and Regeneration:

Hydrogels are very effective in skin regeneration because they contain high percentages of water, are oxygen permeable, and can be used to create a moist healing environment.⁵⁴ In chronic wounds, like diabetic ulcers, bioactive hydrogels filled with antimicrobial agents, growth factors (e.g., EGF, VEGF), or ECM-mimetic peptides can enhance the process of re-epithelialization as well as granulation tissue formation. They can adapt to irregular geometries of the wound as well as be used for localized drug delivery, so it is perfect for difficult wound environments. In the case of burns and extensive area skin wounds, hydrogels have been proposed as temporary bioactive dressings for infection protection and delivery of regenerative cues. The addition of stem cells or exosomes introduces additional tissue repair capability through the stimulation of angiogenesis and the minimization of inflammation.⁵⁵ Intelligent, stimulus-triggered hydrogel systems that deliver therapeutics upon pH or enzymatic stimulation are of special importance in infected or inflamed wound beds, providing precision therapy in dynamic healing environments.⁴⁶ Regeneration of cartilage is still a clinical problem owing to its vascularity and limited intrinsic healing response. Chondroitin sulfate, hyaluronic acid, or transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) containing ECM-mimetic hydrogels can maintain the viability of chondrocytes and enhance extracellular matrix production.⁵⁶ Zonation within the hydrogel can mimic the depth-dependent organization of native cartilage, enhancing mechanical function and durability. In bone repair, hydrogels usually serve as osteoconductive and osteoinductive matrices, providing bone morphogenetic proteins (BMP-2, BMP-7), calcium phosphate particles, or angiogenic factors to facilitate mineralization as well as vascularization.⁵⁷ Injectable, self-healing hydrogel systems can seal irregular defects, respond to dynamic loading, and degrade at rates coordinated with new bone growth. Hybrid systems that integrate hydrogels with rigid scaffolds or nanofillers are required for load-bearing applications to achieve the required mechanical strength.⁵⁸ Cardiac tissue repair requires scaffolds capable of supporting contractile function, electrical conductivity, and vascular integration. Hydrogels functionalized with conductive nanomaterials (e.g., graphene, gold nanowires) can enhance electrical coupling between cardiomyocytes, improving synchronous beating in engineered cardiac patches.⁵⁹ Inclusion of angiogenic factors supports rapid vascularization, essential for long-term graft survival. For vascular grafting, hydrogels may be engineered to mimic the native vessels' compliance and mechanical properties and to include cues for endothelialization as well as anti-thrombosis. Bioprinting technologies enable the fabrication of complex vascular geometry with cell-laden hydrogels to create patient-specific grafts with predetermined mechanical and biological properties.⁶⁰ Hydrogels for neural recovery need to promote axonal extension, synapse formation, and remyelination while reducing the formation of scar tissue. Spatially oriented hydrogel fibers through electrospinning or microchannel fabrication can offer contact guidance for regenerating axons. The presence of neurotrophic factors like nerve growth factor (NGF) or brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) increases neuronal survival and outgrowth.⁶¹ Conductive hydrogels with carbon nanotubes or conducting polymers can enable electrical stimulation of neural networks, allowing for functional recovery. Spinal cord injury has been treated with injectable hydrogels that span lesion gaps while releasing anti-inflammatory agents and neuroprotective signals, which have proven to decrease glial scarring and enable axonal reconnection.⁶² In organ bioengineering, hydrogels act as the bioink for 3D bioprinting to produce intricate, cell-containing constructs with specified architectures.⁶³ ECM-derived hydrogels like decellularized organ matrix gels supply native biochemical complexity and facilitate tissue-specific differentiation. Their mechanically tunable properties and crosslinking chemistries enable compatibility with various printing modalities ranging from extrusion-based to light-assisted bioprinting. Outside structural functions, bioactive hydrogels may contain vascular and parenchymal cell populations organized in spatially defined patterns, enabling the fabrication of perfusable organ models. In liver and kidney tissue engineering, hydrogels that are functionalized with organ-specific growth factors and adhesion motifs enable maturation and functional integration of engineered tissue, inching toward clinically relevant implantable organs.⁶⁴

6. Future Integration with Advanced Technologies

6.1 3D/4D Bioprinting of Bioactive Hydrogels

3D bioprinting has revolutionized the production of hydrogel-based constructs by making it possible to deposit cells, biomolecules, and materials with high precision into intricate architectures.^63,65 Bioactive hydrogels are used as bioinks, which possess printability as well as cell-supportive environments that maintain viability and functionality during and after printing. Improvements in coaxial and multi-material printing make it possible to fabricate heterogeneous tissues with chemically and mechanically different biochemical properties that exhibit structural and functional complexity similar to native tissues. 4D bioprinting adds a dynamic aspect, in which printed hydrogel constructs are designed to shift shape, stiffness, or function over time upon stimulation by environmental signals.⁶⁶ This allows the development of adaptive implants that change with regenerating tissue. By incorporating stimuli-responsive hydrogels into 4D printing processes, it is possible to develop constructs that self-tune to physiological shifts, possibly cutting down on the need for surgical revision.

6.2 Nanotechnology-Enabled Bioactivity Enhancement:

Nanotechnology provides highly effective tools to increase the bioactivity and multifunctionality of hydrogels. The addition of nanoparticles like gold nanorods, silica nanoparticles, or carbon-based nanomaterials can enhance mechanical strength, electrical conductivity, or response to external stimuli.⁶⁷ Nanoscale carriers can also deliver highly controlled release of therapeutic agents such as small molecules, siRNA, or CRISPR-based gene editors directly within the hydrogel matrix.⁶⁸ In addition, surface nanostructure modifications enhance the surface area available for protein adsorption, ligand presentation, and cell attachment, enhancing the biological signaling ability of the hydrogel. By recreating the nanotopography of the native ECM, these modifications can affect cell shape, migration, and differentiation, providing one more level of control in regeneration applications.⁶⁹

6.3 Bioelectronics for Real-Time Tissue Monitoring:

The merging of hydrogels and flexible bioelectronics makes it possible to monitor tissue regeneration processes in real time. Conductive or ionic hydrogels can be coupled with in situ sensors to monitor parameters like pH, oxygen level, mechanical strain, or electrophysiological activity. The devices are capable of sending continuous, non-invasive information about the functional status of regenerating tissues, enabling intervention in a timely manner.⁷⁰ Bioelectronic-hydrogel composites can also actively control the regenerative process by providing electrical stimulation to enhance angiogenesis, nerve growth, or muscle contraction. The biocompatibility and softness of hydrogels reduce mechanical mismatch with adjacent tissues, causing less inflammation and enhanced long-term stability of implanted electronic devices.⁷¹

6.4 AI-Guided Hydrogel Design for Personalized Medicine:

Artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming a revolutionary tool for rational design of hydrogels, making it possible to predict the best material composition, structure, and functional modifications for desired biological behavior.⁷² Machine learning algorithms modeled from large experimental datasets are capable of recognizing patterns between hydrogel parameters and cell response, degradation kinetics, or clinical efficacy with great speed.

In tailored medicine, machine-learning-based modeling can combine patient-specific information, e.g., genetic profiles, imaging outcomes, and biomechanical properties create personalized hydrogel formulations that match individual healing needs. When coupled with fast fabrication techniques such as 3D printing, this method can have the potential to produce demand-driven patient-specific regenerative implants, enhancing both therapeutic effectiveness and clinical acceptance ⁷³

7. CONCLUSION:

The evolution of biomaterials has been a fundamental conceptual shift from the initial paradigm of inert, space-filling scaffolds to the vision currently emerging for active, intelligent tissue architects. Bioactive hydrogels are now leading this revolution, able to mimic the extracellular matrix, deliver precisely controlled biochemical signals, control mechanical environments, and dynamically interact with host tissues and cells. This transition is a sign of a wider understanding that successful regeneration is more than just structural support, but about directing the intricate biological symphony of repair, remodelling, and functional restoration. Through the integration of principles from materials science, synthetic biology, nanotechnology, bioelectronics, and artificial intelligence, next-generation hydrogels promise to revolutionize regenerative medicine from a field in many ways still reactive into a proactive, adaptive, and patient-specific science. The intersection of these disciplines offers therapeutic systems not only biocompatible and bioactive, but responsive, self-healing, and context-awareable to adapt in concert with regenerating tissue. As research continues towards clinically relevant, scalable, and ethically sound solutions, smart hydrogel platforms can change the game for tissue repair and regeneration over the next few decades.

8. ACKNOWLEDGMENT:

The author expresses sincere gratitude to NIMS Institute of Pharmacy, NIMS University, Jaipur, Rajasthan, for providing the necessary facilities and support to carry out this review work. The author also acknowledges the contributions of colleagues, researchers, and all those whose work and insights have enriched the preparation of this manuscript.

9. CONFLICT OF INTEREST:

The author declares no conflict of interest related to this work.

10. REFERENCES:

1. Gharat JS, Dalvi YV. Compressive Review on Hydrogel. Asian Jour Pharm and Technol [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2025 Aug 19]; 8(3): 172. Available from: http://www.indianjournals.com/ijor.aspx?target=ijor:ajptandvolume=8andissue=3andarticle=011

2. R Choi J. Applications of biomaterials in regenerative medicine. J Stem Cell Res Med [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2025 Aug 15];4(1). Available from: https://www.oatext.com/applications-of-biomaterials-in-regenerative-medicine.php

3. Han F, Wang J, Ding L, Hu Y, Li W, Yuan Z, et al. Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine: Achievements, Future, and Sustainability in Asia. Front Bioeng Biotechnol [Internet]. 2020 Mar 24 [cited 2025 Aug 15]; 8:83. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fbioe.2020.00083/full

4. Zhang H, Lin X, Cao X, Wang Y, Wang J, Zhao Y. Developing natural polymers for skin wound healing. Bioactive Materials [Internet]. 2024 Mar [cited 2025 Aug 15]; 33:355–76. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2452199X23003614

5. Zhao X, Hu DA, Wu D, He F, Wang H, Huang L, et al. Applications of Biocompatible Scaffold Materials in Stem Cell-Based Cartilage Tissue Engineering. Front Bioeng Biotechnol [Internet]. 2021 Mar 25 [cited 2025 Aug 15]; 9:603444. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbioe.2021.603444/full

6. Yu X, Tang X, Gohil SV, Laurencin CT. Biomaterials for Bone Regenerative Engineering. Adv Healthcare Materials [Internet]. 2015 Jun [cited 2025 Aug 15]; 4(9): 1268–85. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/adhm.201400760

7. El-Husseiny HM, Mady EA, Hamabe L, Abugomaa A, Shimada K, Yoshida T, et al. Smart/stimuli-responsive hydrogels: Cutting-edge platforms for tissue engineering and other biomedical applications. Materials Today Bio [Internet]. 2022 Jan [cited 2025 Aug 15]; 13:100186. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2590006421000946

8. Taneja H, Salodkar SM, Singh Parmar A, Chaudhary S. Hydrogel based 3D printing: Bio ink for tissue engineering. Journal of Molecular Liquids [Internet]. 2022 Dec [cited 2025 Aug 15]; 367:120390. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0167732222019298

9. El-Sherbiny IM, Yacoub MH. Hydrogel scaffolds for tissue engineering: Progress and challenges. Global Cardiology Science and Practice [Internet]. 2013 Sep [cited 2025 Aug 15]; 2013(3): 38. Available from: http://www.qscience.com/doi/abs/10.5339/gcsp.2013.38

10. Thang NH, Chien TB, Cuong DX. Polymer-Based Hydrogels Applied in Drug Delivery: An Overview. Gels [Internet]. 2023 Jun 27 [cited 2025 Aug 15]; 9(7): 523. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2310-2861/9/7/523

11. Lu P, Ruan D, Huang M, Tian M, Zhu K, Gan Z, et al. Harnessing the potential of hydrogels for advanced therapeutic applications: current achievements and future directions. Sig Transduct Target Ther [Internet]. 2024 Jul 1 [cited 2025 Aug 15]; 9(1):166. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41392-024-01852-x

12. Mohapatra S, Mirza MohdA, Hilles AR, Zakir F, Gomes AC, Ansari MJ, et al. Biomedical Application, Patent Repository, Clinical Trial and Regulatory Updates on Hydrogel: An Extensive Review. Gels [Internet]. 2021 Nov 12 [cited 2025 Aug 15];7(4):207. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2310-2861/7/4/207

13. Aizarna-Lopetegui U, Bittinger SC, Álvarez N, Henriksen-Lacey M, Jimenez De Aberasturi D. Stimuli-responsive hybrid materials for 4D in vitro tissue models. Materials Today Bio [Internet]. 2025 Aug [cited 2025 Aug 15]; 33:102035. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2590006425006052

14. Parvin N, Kumar V, Joo SW, Mandal TK. Cutting-Edge Hydrogel Technologies in Tissue Engineering and Biosensing: An Updated Review. Materials [Internet]. 2024 Sep 29 [cited 2025 Aug 15];17(19):4792. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/17/19/4792

15. Zhao E, Tang X, Li X, Zhao J, Wang S, Wei G, et al. Bioactive multifunctional hydrogels accelerate burn wound healing via M2 macrophage-polarization, antioxidant and anti-inflammatory. Materials Today Bio [Internet]. 2025 Jun [cited 2025 Aug 15]; 32:101686. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2590006425002455

16. Sun G, Shen YI, Kusuma S, Fox-Talbot K, Steenbergen CJ, Gerecht S. Functional neovascularization of biodegradable dextran hydrogels with multiple angiogenic growth factors. Biomaterials [Internet]. 2011 Jan [cited 2025 Aug 15];32(1):95–106. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0142961210011294

17. Wang F, Cai X, Shen Y, Meng L. Cell–scaffold interactions in tissue engineering for oral and craniofacial reconstruction. Bioactive Materials [Internet]. 2023 May [cited 2025 Aug 15];23:16–44. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2452199X22004637

18. Jaiswal R, Bhadani R. Conductivity Evaluation of Smart Hydrogels composed of Polyacrylamide-Polyaniline. AJRC [Internet]. 2025 Apr 18 [cited 2025 Aug 19]; 67–70. Available from: https://ajrconline.org/AbstractView.aspx?PID=2025-18-2-1

19. Rana MM, De La Hoz Siegler H. Evolution of Hybrid Hydrogels: Next-Generation Biomaterials for Drug Delivery and Tissue Engineering. Gels [Internet]. 2024 Mar 22 [cited 2025 Aug 15]; 10(4): 216. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2310-2861/10/4/216

20. Parhi R. Cross-Linked Hydrogel for Pharmaceutical Applications: A Review. Adv Pharm Bull [Internet]. 2017 Dec 31 [cited 2025 Aug 15]; 7(4): 515–30. Available from: http://apb.tbzmed.ac.ir/Abstract/APB_19295_20170413093617

21. Ribeiro MM, Simões M, Vitorino C, Mascarenhas-Melo F. Physical crosslinking of hydrogels: The potential of dynamic and reversible bonds in burn care. Coordination Chemistry Reviews [Internet]. 2025 Nov [cited 2025 Aug 15]; 542:216868. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0010854525004382

22. Moreira Teixeira LS, Feijen J, Van Blitterswijk CA, Dijkstra PJ, Karperien M. Enzyme-catalyzed crosslinkable hydrogels: Emerging strategies for tissue engineering. Biomaterials [Internet]. 2012 Feb [cited 2025 Aug 15]; 33(5): 1281–90. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S014296121101283X

23. Salthouse D, Novakovic K, Hilkens CMU, Ferreira AM. Interplay between biomaterials and the immune system: Challenges and opportunities in regenerative medicine. Acta Biomaterialia [Internet]. 2023 Jan [cited 2025 Aug 15]; 155:1–18. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1742706122007255

24. Kasoju N, Sunilkumar A. Convergence of tissue engineering and sustainable development goals. Biotechnol Sustain Mater [Internet]. 2024 Dec 19 [cited 2025 Aug 15];1(1):20. Available from: https://biotechsustainablematerials.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s44316-024-00021-y

25. Blache U, Ford EM, Ha B, Rijns L, Chaudhuri O, Dankers PYW, et al. Engineered hydrogels for mechanobiology. Nat Rev Methods Primers [Internet]. 2022 Dec 15 [cited 2025 Aug 15]; 2(1): 98. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/s43586-022-00179-7

26. Cun X, Hosta-Rigau L. Topography: A Biophysical Approach to Direct the Fate of Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Tissue Engineering Applications. Nanomaterials [Internet]. 2020 Oct 20 [cited 2025 Aug 15];10(10):2070. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4991/10/10/2070

27. Alex M, Alsawaftah NM, Husseini GA. State-of-All-the-Art and Prospective Hydrogel-Based Transdermal Drug Delivery Systems. Applied Sciences [Internet]. 2024 Mar 30 [cited 2025 Aug 15]; 14(7): 2926. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/14/7/2926

28. Kutluk H, Bastounis EE, Constantinou I. Integration of Extracellular Matrices into Organ‐on‐Chip Systems. Adv Healthcare Materials [Internet]. 2023 Aug [cited 2025 Aug 15]; 12(20): 2203256. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/adhm.202203256

29. Niland S, Riscanevo AX, Eble JA. Matrix Metalloproteinases Shape the Tumor Microenvironment in Cancer Progression. IJMS [Internet]. 2021 Dec 23 [cited 2025 Aug 15]; 23(1): 146. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/23/1/146

30. Chan BP, Leong KW. Scaffolding in tissue engineering: general approaches and tissue-specific considerations. Eur Spine J [Internet]. 2008 Dec [cited 2025 Aug 15]; 17(S4): 467–79. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00586-008-0745-3

31. He W, Reaume M, Hennenfent M, Lee BP, Rajachar R. Biomimetic hydrogels with spatial- and temporal-controlled chemical cues for tissue engineering. Biomater Sci [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2025 Aug 15]; 8(12): 3248–69. Available from: https://xlink.rsc.org/?DOI=D0BM00263A

32. Liang W, Zhou C, Liu X, Xie Q, Xia L, Liu L, et al. Current status of nano-embedded growth factors and stem cells delivery to bone for targeted repair and regeneration. Journal of Orthopaedic Translation [Internet]. 2025 Jan [cited 2025 Aug 15]; 50:257–73. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2214031X24001657

33. Zustiak SP, Durbal R, Leach JB. Influence of cell-adhesive peptide ligands on poly (ethylene glycol) hydrogel physical, mechanical and transport properties. Acta Biomaterialia [Internet]. 2010 Sep [cited 2025 Aug 15]; 6(9): 3404–14. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1742706110001753

34. Nazarzadeh Zare E, Khorsandi D, Zarepour A, Yilmaz H, Agarwal T, Hooshmand S, et al. Biomedical applications of engineered heparin-based materials. Bioactive Materials [Internet]. 2024 Jan [cited 2025 Aug 15]; 31:87–118. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2452199X23002414

35. Song J, Gerecht S. Hydrogels to Recapture Extracellular Matrix Cues That Regulate Vascularization. ATVB [Internet]. 2023 Aug [cited 2025 Aug 15]; 43(8). Available from: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/ATVBAHA.122.318235

36. Zhang S, Liu J, Feng F, Jia Y, Xu F, Wei Z, et al. Rational design of viscoelastic hydrogels for periodontal ligament remodeling and repair. Acta Biomaterialia [Internet]. 2024 Jan [cited 2025 Aug 15]; 174:69–90. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1742706123007213

37. Wang Q, Zhang Y, Ma Y, Wang M, Pan G. Nano-crosslinked dynamic hydrogels for biomedical applications. Materials Today Bio [Internet]. 2023 Jun [cited 2025 Aug 15]; 20:100640. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S259000642300100X

38. Qazi TH, Blatchley MR, Davidson MD, Yavitt FM, Cooke ME, Anseth KS, et al. Programming hydrogels to probe spatiotemporal cell biology. Cell Stem Cell [Internet]. 2022 May [cited 2025 Aug 15];29(5):678–91. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1934590922001114

39. Jahanbekam S, Asare-Addo K, Alipour S, Nokhodchi A. Smart hydrogels and the promise of multi-responsive in-situ systems. Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology [Internet]. 2025 May [cited 2025 Aug 15]; 107:106758. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1773224725001613

40. Ulijn RV, Bibi N, Jayawarna V, Thornton PD, Todd SJ, Mart RJ, et al. Bioresponsive hydrogels. Materials Today [Internet]. 2007 Apr [cited 2025 Aug 15];10(4):40–8. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1369702107700494

41. Abueva CDg, Chung PS, Ryu HS, Park SY, Woo SH. Photoresponsive Hydrogels as Drug Delivery Systems. Medical Lasers [Internet]. 2020 Jun 30 [cited 2025 Aug 15];9(1):6–11. Available from: http://www.jkslms.or.kr/journal/view.html?doi=10.25289/ML.2020.9.1.6

42. Malik US, Niazi MBK, Jahan Z, Zafar MI, Vo DVN, Sher F. Nano-structured dynamic Schiff base cues as robust self-healing polymers for biomedical and tissue engineering applications: a review. Environ Chem Lett [Internet]. 2022 Feb [cited 2025 Aug 15];20(1):495–517. Available from: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10311-021-01337-1

43. Li Y, Hoffman MD, Benoit DSW. Matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-degradable tissue engineered periosteum coordinates allograft healing via early-stage recruitment and support of host neurovasculature. Biomaterials [Internet]. 2021 Jan [cited 2025 Aug 15]; 268:120535. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S014296122030781X

44. Jo DY, Rafii S, Hamada T, Moore MAS. Chemotaxis of primitive hematopoietic cells in response to stromal cell–derived factor-1. J Clin Invest [Internet]. 2000 Jan 1 [cited 2025 Aug 15];105(1):101–11. Available from: http://www.jci.org/articles/view/7954

45. Gattazzo F, Urciuolo A, Bonaldo P. Extracellular matrix: A dynamic microenvironment for stem cell niche. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects [Internet]. 2014 Aug [cited 2025 Aug 15];1840(8):2506–19. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0304416514000129

46. Chakrapani G, Zare M, Ramakrishna S. Intelligent hydrogels and their biomedical applications. Mater Adv [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2025 Aug 15];3(21):7757–72. Available from: https://xlink.rsc.org/?DOI=D2MA00527A

47. Rezaei Z, Yilmaz-Aykut D, Tourk FM, Bassous N, Barroso-Zuppa M, Shawl AI, et al. Immunomodulating Hydrogels as Stealth Platform for Drug Delivery Applications. Pharmaceutics [Internet]. 2022 Oct 21 [cited 2025 Aug 15];14(10):2244. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4923/14/10/2244

48. Ding K, Liao M, Wang Y, Lu JR. Advances in Composite Stimuli-Responsive Hydrogels for Wound Healing: Mechanisms and Applications. Gels [Internet]. 2025 May 31 [cited 2025 Aug 15];11(6):420. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2310-2861/11/6/420

49. Kaur H, Gogoi B, Sharma I, Das DK, Azad MA, Pramanik DD, et al. Hydrogels as a Potential Biomaterial for Multimodal Therapeutic Applications. Mol Pharmaceutics [Internet]. 2024 Oct 7 [cited 2025 Aug 15];21(10):4827–48. Available from: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.4c00595

50. Jang HJ, Yoon JK. The Role of Vasculature and Angiogenic Strategies in Bone Regeneration. Biomimetics [Internet]. 2024 Jan 26 [cited 2025 Aug 15];9(2):75. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2313-7673/9/2/75

51. Giraudo MV, Di Francesco D, Catoira MC, Cotella D, Fusaro L, Boccafoschi F. Angiogenic Potential in Biological Hydrogels. Biomedicines [Internet]. 2020 Oct 20 [cited 2025 Aug 15];8(10):436. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9059/8/10/436

52. Hasanzadeh E, Seifalian A, Mellati A, Saremi J, Asadpour S, Enderami SE, et al. Injectable hydrogels in central nervous system: Unique and novel platforms for promoting extracellular matrix remodeling and tissue engineering. Materials Today Bio [Internet]. 2023 Jun [cited 2025 Aug 15]; 20:100614. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2590006423000741

53. Li R, Xu J, Rao Z, Deng R, Xu Y, Qiu S, et al. Facilitate Angiogenesis and Neurogenesis by Growth Factors Integrated Decellularized Matrix Hydrogel. Tissue Engineering Part A [Internet]. 2021 Jun 1 [cited 2025 Aug 15];27(11–12):771–87. Available from: https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/10.1089/ten.tea.2020.0227

54. Stan D, Tanase C, Avram M, Apetrei R, Mincu N, Mateescu AL, et al. Wound healing applications of creams and “smart” hydrogels. Experimental Dermatology [Internet]. 2021 Sep [cited 2025 Aug 15];30(9):1218–32. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/exd.14396

55. Jin Y, Li S, Yu Q, Chen T, Liu D. Application of stem cells in regeneration medicine. MedComm [Internet]. 2023 Aug [cited 2025 Aug 15];4(4): e291. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mco2.291

56. Gresham RCH, Bahney CS, Leach JK. Growth factor delivery using extracellular matrix-mimicking substrates for musculoskeletal tissue engineering and repair. Bioactive Materials [Internet]. 2021 Jul [cited 2025 Aug 15];6(7):1945–56. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2452199X2030339X

57. Fedorovich NE, Leeuwenburgh SC, Van Der Helm YJM, Alblas J, Dhert WJA. The osteoinductive potential of printable, cell‐laden hydrogel‐ceramic composites. J Biomedical Materials Res [Internet]. 2012 Sep [cited 2025 Aug 15];100A(9):2412–20. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jbm.a.34171

58. Sousa AC, Alvites R, Lopes B, Sousa P, Moreira A, Coelho A, et al. Hybrid scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: Integration of composites and bioactive hydrogels loaded with hDPSCs. Biomaterials Advances [Internet]. 2025 Jan [cited 2025 Aug 15]; 166:214042. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2772950824002851

59. Lv Q, Zhou D, He Y, Xu T, Qiu X, Zeng J. Engineering functional electroconductive hydrogels for targeted therapy in myocardial infarction repair. Bioactive Materials [Internet]. 2025 Jul [cited 2025 Aug 15]; 49:172–92. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2452199X25000131

60. Budharaju H, Sundaramurthi D, Sethuraman S. Embedded 3D bioprinting – An emerging strategy to fabricate biomimetic and large vascularized tissue constructs. Bioactive Materials [Internet]. 2024 Feb [cited 2025 Aug 15]; 32:356–84. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2452199X23003171

61. Hammam IA, Winters R, Hong Z. Advancements in the application of biomaterials in neural tissue engineering: A review. Biomedical Engineering Advances [Internet]. 2024 Nov [cited 2025 Aug 15]; 8:100132. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2667099224000215

62. Ji R, Hao Z, Wang H, Li X, Duan L, Guan F, et al. Application of Injectable Hydrogels as Delivery Systems in Spinal Cord Injury. Gels [Internet]. 2023 Nov 16 [cited 2025 Aug 15];9(11):907. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2310-2861/9/11/907

63. Gogoi D, Kumar M, Singh J. A comprehensive review on hydrogel-based bio-ink development for tissue engineering scaffolds using 3D printing. Annals of 3D Printed Medicine [Internet]. 2024 Aug [cited 2025 Aug 15]; 15:100159. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2666964124000183

64. Mantha S, Pillai S, Khayambashi P, Upadhyay A, Zhang Y, Tao O, et al. Smart Hydrogels in Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine. Materials [Internet]. 2019 Oct 12 [cited 2025 Aug 15];12(20):3323. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/12/20/3323

65. Kanugo A, Chakravarti A. Recent Advances in the Biomedical Applications of Hydrogels. RJST [Internet]. 2025 Jul 8 [cited 2025 Aug 19];289–95. Available from: https://ajptonline.com/AbstractView.aspx?PID=2025-15-3-12

66. Lai J, Liu Y, Lu G, Yung P, Wang X, Tuan RS, et al. 4D bioprinting of programmed dynamic tissues. Bioactive Materials [Internet]. 2024 Jul [cited 2025 Aug 15]; 37:348–77. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2452199X24001245

67. Coetzee D, Venkataraman M, Militky J, Petru M. Influence of Nanoparticles on Thermal and Electrical Conductivity of Composites. Polymers [Internet]. 2020 Mar 27 [cited 2025 Aug 15];12(4):742. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/12/4/742

68. Ji J, Li L, Guo W, Zhang J, Yao Y, Chen H, et al. Nanoscale synthetic biology with innovative medicinal applications. Fundamental Research [Internet]. 2024 Nov [cited 2025 Aug 15];S266732582400459X. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S266732582400459X

69. Narayanan KB. Nanotopographical Features of Polymeric Nanocomposite Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine: A Review. Biomimetics [Internet]. 2025 May 15 [cited 2025 Aug 15];10(5):317. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2313-7673/10/5/317

70. Lyu X, Hu Y, Shi S, Wang S, Li H, Wang Y, et al. Hydrogel Bioelectronics for Health Monitoring. Biosensors [Internet]. 2023 Aug 14 [cited 2025 Aug 15];13(8):815. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6374/13/8/815

71. Jiao C, Liu J, Yan S, Xu Z, Hou Z, Xu W. Hydrogel-based soft bioelectronic interfaces and their applications. J Mater Chem C [Internet]. 2025 [cited 2025 Aug 15];13(6):2620–45. Available from: https://xlink.rsc.org/?DOI=D4TC04150J

72. Li Z, Song P, Li G, Han Y, Ren X, Bai L, et al. AI energized hydrogel design, optimization and application in biomedicine. Materials Today Bio [Internet]. 2024 Apr [cited 2025 Aug 15]; 25:101014. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2590006424000735

73. Javaid M, Haleem A, Singh RP, Suman R. 3D printing applications for healthcare research and development. Global Health Journal [Internet]. 2022 Dec [cited 2025 Aug 15];6(4):217–26. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2414644722000744

Received on 16.08.2025 Revised on 10.09.2025

Accepted on 29.09.2025 Published on 08.10.2025

Available online from October 17, 2025

Asian J. Pharm. Tech. 2025; 15(4):385-394.

DOI: 10.52711/2231-5713.2025.00056

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Creative Commons License.